2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12016-022-08948-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlates of Protection Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall decline we saw in RSV titer in a population-based cohort from Germany [25] is also similar to other reports assessing changes resulting from the pandemic [39]. While antibodies towards the F protein have been shown to correlate well with neutralizing activity [30], correlates of protection remain unclear [40], as does the impact of 2022-2023 RSV season where a surge in cases was reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The overall decline we saw in RSV titer in a population-based cohort from Germany [25] is also similar to other reports assessing changes resulting from the pandemic [39]. While antibodies towards the F protein have been shown to correlate well with neutralizing activity [30], correlates of protection remain unclear [40], as does the impact of 2022-2023 RSV season where a surge in cases was reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The overall decline we saw in RSV titer in a population-based cohort from Germany [ 25 ] is also similar to other reports assessing changes resulting from the pandemic [ 39 ]. While antibodies toward the F protein have been shown to correlate well with neutralizing activity [ 30 ], correlates of protection remain unclear [ 40 ], as does the impact of 2022–2023 RSV season where a surge in cases was reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that palivizumab serum titers, or RSV neutralizing titers corresponding to palivizumab serum titers, equal or above 100 µ g / ml could avert (or at least postpone) RSV-related mortality. Although this threshold has been the best established correlation with protection to date [34] , [35] , [11] , studies that have investigated other immunological correlates of protections against severe RSV disease have yielded inconsistent findings [36] . As we use the protection threshold to predict the number of days protected, a lower or higher threshold would lead to a under- or overestimation of the number of days protected and therefore different impact estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%