2014
DOI: 10.1186/1472-698x-14-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlates of out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditures in Tanzania: results from a national household survey

Abstract: BackgroundInequality in health services access and utilization are influenced by out-of-pocket health expenditures in many low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Various antecedents such as social factors, poor health and economic factors are proposed to direct the choice of health care service use and incurring out-of-pocket payments. We investigated the association of these factors with out-of-pocket health expenditures among the adult and older population in the United Republic of Tanzania. We also invest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
149
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
9
149
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Female-headed households were more likely to experience CHE than male-headed households as were rural households as compared to urban households. This is confirmed by Tanzania data which found that increased age, female sex, obesity, and disability increased adults' OOP health expenditures significantly -and, among older adults specifically (60+), disability and visiting traditional healers increased expenditures (Brinda et al, 2014). In Cote d'Ivoire, sex, duration of ART use, education of the household head, household size and household income quintile were all significant predictors of CHE (Beauliere et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Female-headed households were more likely to experience CHE than male-headed households as were rural households as compared to urban households. This is confirmed by Tanzania data which found that increased age, female sex, obesity, and disability increased adults' OOP health expenditures significantly -and, among older adults specifically (60+), disability and visiting traditional healers increased expenditures (Brinda et al, 2014). In Cote d'Ivoire, sex, duration of ART use, education of the household head, household size and household income quintile were all significant predictors of CHE (Beauliere et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…OOP expenditure is usually in the form of direct payments by households towards various types of health care and in general, OOP health expenditures are high in many countries in Africa and many households experience a high burden of catastrophic health expenditures (CHEs; Brinda, Andres, & Enemark, 2014;Chuma & Maina, 2012;Macha et al, 2012;Mills et al, 2012). In 2009, over 70% of private expenditure on health care came from household OOP payments in 27 African countries (Sambo, Kirigia, & Orem, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, out-ofpocket (OOP) payments can influence the equality of access to and utilization of health services and decelerate the movement toward UHC (2). Facing with CHE can influence the health of all household members and may push the households into poverty health cycle (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported that in 1997 catastrophic spending on healthcare was observed in 5.77% of household in the country 14 , whereas in 2004 this type of spending affected 3.6% of households 15 . Compared to other countries, the spending of argentine households on health-related events may be considered low, since some countries exhibit an incidence of catastrophic spending be- tween 10% and 27% of households, estimated on the basis of a cut-off point of 40% of expenditure exclusive of food ( [16][17][18] ). As to factors that determine household spending on healthcare, those having members below 14 years of age show the highest spending, and the same applies for those having members above 65 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%