2023
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2021.3116943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated Chained Gaussian Processes for Datasets With Multiple Annotators

Abstract: The labeling process within a supervised learning 1 task is usually carried out by an expert, which provides the 2 ground truth (gold standard) for each sample. However, in many 3 real-world applications, we typically have access to annotations 4 provided by crowds holding different and unknown expertise 5 levels. Learning from crowds intends to configure machine 6 learning paradigms in the presence of multi-labelers, residing on 7 two key assumptions: the labeler's performance does not depend 8 on the input s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the simulations are performed by assuming: (i) dependencies among annotators and (ii) the labelers’ performances are modeled as a function of the input features. In turn, the semiparametric latent factor model is used to build the labels, as follows [ 56 ]: Define Q deterministic functions and their combination parameters . Compute , where is the n -th component of , being the 1-D representation of the input features in by using t-SNE approach [ 29 ].…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the simulations are performed by assuming: (i) dependencies among annotators and (ii) the labelers’ performances are modeled as a function of the input features. In turn, the semiparametric latent factor model is used to build the labels, as follows [ 56 ]: Define Q deterministic functions and their combination parameters . Compute , where is the n -th component of , being the 1-D representation of the input features in by using t-SNE approach [ 29 ].…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%