Correlated Adiabatic and Isocurvature Cosmic Microwave Background Fluctuations in the Wake of the Results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe

Abstract

In general correlated models, in addition to the usual adiabatic component with a spectral index n ad1 there is another adiabatic component with a spectral index n ad2 generated by entropy perturbation during inflation. We extend the analysis of a correlated mixture of adiabatic and isocurvature CMB fluctuations of the wmap group, who set the two adiabatic spectral indices equal. Allowing n ad1 and n ad2 to vary independently we find that the wmap data favor models where the two adiabatic components have opposite spectral tilts. Using the wmap data only, the 2σ upper bound for the isocurvature fraction fiso of the initial power spectrum at k0 = 0.05 Mpc −1 increases somewhat, e.g., from 0.76 of n ad2 = n ad1 models to 0.84 with a prior niso < 1.84 for the isocurvature spectral index. We also comment on a possible degeneration between the correlation component and the optical depth τ . Moreover, the measured low quadrupole in the TT angular power could be achieved by a strong negative correlation, but then one needs a large τ to fit the TE spectrum. Introduction. The first studies of mixed initial conditions for density perturbations in the light of measured cosmic microwave background (CMB) angular power assumed the adiabatic and isocurvature components to be uncorrelated [1,2,3]. About the same time it was pointed out that inflation with more than one scalar field may lead to a correlation between the adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations [4]. If the trajectory in the field space is curved during inflation, the entropy perturbation generates an adiabatic perturbation that is fully correlated with the entropy perturbation [5,6,7,8]. In addition, there is also the usual adiabatic perturbation created, e.g., by inflaton fluctuations. Thus, in the final angular power spectrum, one could have four different components: (1) the usual independent adiabatic component, (2) a second adiabatic component generated by the entropy perturbation during inflation, (3) an isocurvature component, and (4) a correlation between the second adiabatic and the isocurvature component. In this Letter we assume power laws for the initial power spectra of these components and denote their spectral indices by n ad1 , n ad2 , n iso , and n cor , respectively. Only three of these are free parameters, since, e.g., n cor = (n ad2 + n iso )/2.Although pure isocurvature models have been ruled out [9] after the clear detection of the second acoustic peak [10], the correlated mixture of adiabatic and isocurvature fluctuations still remains as an interesting possibility. In [7,11] angular power spectra have been calculated for correlated models and compared to the CMB data, but the spectral indices have either been fixed or set equal, n ad1 = n ad2 = n iso = n cor . This is not necessarily well motivated theoretically. For example, if the entropy field is slightly massive during inflation, then n ad1 < ∼ 1.0 < n iso in most models.Recently, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (wmap) accurately measured the temperature anisotropy spectrum up ...

Bayesian model selection and isocurvature perturbations

“…Similarly, the cross-correlation amplitude can be parametrized either by the correlation angle β ∈ [−1, 1], as in Refs. [4,10], or by the amplitude of the cross-correlation power spectrum 2β α(1 − α) [6]. The advantage of the latter is that the total power spectrum depends linearly on it, and so it is well constrained by the data, while starting from a flat prior on β we can get a flat posterior distribution if the preferred model is purely adiabatic, so that the value of β does not matter (this point is discussed in detail in Ref.…”

“…In addition, there have been many attempts to analyze more general models featuring additional physics, either to constrain such processes or in the hope of discovering some trace effects in the data. A case of particular interest is the possible addition of an admixture of isocurvature perturbations to the adiabatic ones [2,3] which has been studied in the post-WMAP era by many authors [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].…”

Parameter dependence of magnetized CMB observables

“…In the case of entropic initial conditions the curvature inhomogeneities are due to the fluctuations of the sound speed which are related, in turn, to the fluctuations of the specific entropy (see last part of section 2). Non-adiabatic initial conditions can be observationally constrained in different ways [50,51,52,53,54] and may lead, in the magnetized case, to interesting shape effects on the CMB observables. There are, of course, also different themes which involve the physics of large-scale magnetic fields in connection with CMB physics (see [47] for a dedicated review).…”

Probing Inflation with CMB Polarization

“…In the case N = 2, one is left with two amplitudes, one correlation angle and three independent tilts [254,260].…”