Correlação entre percepção subjetiva do esforço e fadiga neuromuscular dos membros inferiores em atletas de futebol

Müller, Caique Lopes; Neto, Pedro Sotero da Cunha; Santos, Eloir Junior da Silva dos; Oliveira, Alexandre; Legnani, Rosimeide Francisco Santos; Legnani, Elto

doi:10.36453/2318-5104.2020.v18.n3.p37

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It should be noted that these studies on the RPE take a stand on plyometric intensity without any means of comparison (EMG, RSI, or force platforms). This is of concern, given that previous research (Müller et al, 2020) has found a weak relationship between RPE and reactive jumps power. Therefore, there is a need for further studies assessing the reliability and validity of the RPE for determining plyometric intensity.…”

Section: General Discussion On Plyometric Intensitymentioning

confidence: 89%

Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review provides critical and propositional information on criteria for determining the volume and intensity of drop jumps during plyometric training programs. Eligibility criteria were defined according to PICOS: Participants: male or female athletes, trained or recreationally active (16–40 years). Intervention duration: more than 4 weeks. Comparators: passive or active control group during a plyometric training program. Outcomes: information on improvement with Drop Jump or Depth Jump, with other jumps, acceleration, sprint, strength, and power output. Design: randomized controlled trials. We searched articles published in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search was conducted until 10 September 2022 for English-language articles only. The risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for randomized controlled studies. We identified 31495 studies, of which only 22 were included. We found that six groups presented results with women, 15 presented results with men, and the remaining four presented mixed studies. Of the 686 people recruited, 329 participants aged 25.79 ± 4.76 years were involved in training. Methodological problems in training intensity, volume distribution, and individualization were noted, but methodological recommendations for their solution are also provided. It is concluded that the drop height should not be understood as the intensity determinant of plyometric training. Intensity is determined by ground reaction forces, power output, and jump height, among other factors. Furthermore, the athletes’ experience level selection should be based on the formulas recommended within this research. These results could be helpful for those who intend to conduct new plyometric training programs and research.

show abstract

Section: General Discussion On Plyometric Intensitymentioning

confidence: 89%

Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump

Montoro-Bombú

Arencibia

Buzzichelli

et al. 2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to verify the validity of the Push Band 2.0 (PB2.0) device on the reactive strength index (RSI) measurement, using a force plate (FP) and an optical sensor device, OptoJump (OPT), as a reference. Twenty trained athletes performed 60 drop jump trials with a height box of 30 cm. A randomized repeated measures study was conducted during a single session using the PB2.0, the OPT, and the plate force manually synchronized to obtain RSI data for each jump. Validity was analyzed by contrasting three measures: the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), the Bland–Altman test, and R2 coefficient of determination. Bland–Altman analysis showed that RSI and FP for PB2.0 (media = −0.047; IC 93.34%) of all data were within the confidence interval, indicating a statistically reliable result. The RSI measured by the OPT and PB2.0 also provided similar values (media = −0.047). These data are identical to other validity measures (ICC and linear correlation) but differ in the R2 values. The explained variation of PB2.0 measures attained only 29.3% of the FP (R2 = 0.293) and 29.5% (R2 = 0.295) of the OPT assessment, showing a very low determination coefficient. The results of this study point to caution in the use of PB2.0 when measuring RSI in scientific research.

show abstract

Correlação entre percepção subjetiva do esforço e fadiga neuromuscular dos membros inferiores em atletas de futebol

Cited by 2 publications

References 20 publications

Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review

Methodological considerations for determining the volume and intensity of drop jump training. A systematic, critical and prepositive review

The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About