2016
DOI: 10.1137/15m1037147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrector Estimates for Elliptic Systems with Random Periodic Coefficients

Abstract: We consider an elliptic system of equations on the torus − L 2 , L 2 d with random coefficients A, that are assumed to be coercive and stationary. Using two different approaches we obtain moment bounds on the gradient of the corrector, independent of the domain size L. In the first approach we use Green function representation. For that we require A to be locally Hölder continuous and distribution of A to satisfy Logarithmic Sobolev inequality. The second method works for non-smooth (possibly discontinuous) co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude this subsection by mentioning two more recent related works: both Ben-Artzi, Marahrens and Neukamm [8] and Bella and Otto [7] obtained moment bounds on the gradient of the approximate correctors for linear elliptic systems using concentration inequalities, and Lamacz, Neukamm and Otto [30] obtained such estimates for a percolation model using similar methods.…”
Section: Motivation and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We conclude this subsection by mentioning two more recent related works: both Ben-Artzi, Marahrens and Neukamm [8] and Bella and Otto [7] obtained moment bounds on the gradient of the approximate correctors for linear elliptic systems using concentration inequalities, and Lamacz, Neukamm and Otto [30] obtained such estimates for a percolation model using similar methods.…”
Section: Motivation and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, for 0 ≤ β < 1 − 2 d , this implies the existence and uniqueness of a stationary extended corrector (φ, σ) with finite second moment that solves (6)- (8).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We note that according to (8) and (30), σ−σ t satisfies − (σ−σ t ) = ∇×(q−q t )+ 1 t σ t . On B R , we split σ − σ t = u + w according to…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that it is completely arbitrary whetherũ h orṽ h takes care of the extra term´| x|=R ν k ∂ i v ′ h ∂ j u ′ C sym ijk . Existence and uniqueness ofũ h andṽ h , as defined by (13), (15), and (14), (16), are established in Lemma 9 and Lemma 10, respectively. Remark 1.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…whereũ h is associated to u h according to (13), (15) andṽ h to v h according to (14), (16) (see Lemma 9 and Lemma 10 for their construction).…”
Section: Deterministic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%