Correctness and Rationality as Presumptions of Bindingness in Adjudication: On the Methodological Relevance of Judicial Precedents and Dogmatic Models in European Civil Law and Common Law Systems

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Correctness and Rationality as Presumptions of Bindingness in Adjudication: On the Methodological Relevance of Judicial Precedents and Dogmatic Models in European Civil Law and Common Law Systems

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Presumption(s) of Correctness(?): Comparing the Methodological Relevance of Precedents in Civil Law and in Common Law Systems

Presumption(s) of Correctness(?): Comparing the Methodological Relevance of Precedents in Civil Law and in Common Law Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About