2008
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2007.910503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrections to “Performance Analysis of the FastICA Algorithm and CramÉr–Rao Bounds for Linear Independent Component Analysis”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
120
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we completely described in [25] and as it was shown in [38,39], the bounded magnitude signals such as BPSK and uniformly distributed signals have better performance according to the CRB. So, in this paper we consider them for radar signal design as described in the next subsection.…”
Section: Signal Designmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As we completely described in [25] and as it was shown in [38,39], the bounded magnitude signals such as BPSK and uniformly distributed signals have better performance according to the CRB. So, in this paper we consider them for radar signal design as described in the next subsection.…”
Section: Signal Designmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It attempts to find a set of independent components by estimating the maximum negative entropy [12]. The algorithm iteratively searches for the weight set i w of a neural network from a data set X via the procedure below [13]: , and find the winning node J whose value of D is the minimum.…”
Section: Fasticamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two classes of FastICA algorithms, the deflation algorithms (called also one-unit algorithms) and the symmetric algorithms [20]. In the deflation approach, the independent components (ICs) are extracted sequentially, one by one.…”
Section: Fastica -Deflation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in deflation approach vectors of weights are calculated one by one, in symmetric approach the estimation of all components (all weights vectors) proceeds in parallel [19][20]. Instead of Gram-Schmidt procedure, the following formula is used in the orthogonalization step:…”
Section: Fastica -Symmetric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%