2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrections of stratified tropospheric delays in SAR interferometry: Validation with global atmospheric models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
286
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
286
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Image pairs were selected by spatial and temporal baselines: (i) B t < 1 year and B s < 500 m; (ii) B t < 3 year and B s < 300 m; and (iii) B t < 5 year and B s < 100 m (Figure 2). In ascending track 298, the 10 October 2005data extends the time baseline from 2 to 5 years, which is significant for co-registering images [33], which improved the interferometric processing and increased the coherence of interferograms. During SAR data processing, we multilooked the SAR images 4 and 20 times in the azimuth and range directions, respectively, during processing to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Insar Data and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image pairs were selected by spatial and temporal baselines: (i) B t < 1 year and B s < 500 m; (ii) B t < 3 year and B s < 300 m; and (iii) B t < 5 year and B s < 100 m (Figure 2). In ascending track 298, the 10 October 2005data extends the time baseline from 2 to 5 years, which is significant for co-registering images [33], which improved the interferometric processing and increased the coherence of interferograms. During SAR data processing, we multilooked the SAR images 4 and 20 times in the azimuth and range directions, respectively, during processing to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Insar Data and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the magnitude of the atmospheric signals that we should expect to see in interferograms produced from our data set, we estimated phase delay maps using the ERA-Interim (ERA-I) global atmospheric model reanalysis product [Dee et al, 2011] obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). To estimate the combined delay from differences in water vapor (wet delay) and atmospheric pressure (hydrostatic delay), we first created delay maps using the method of Doin et al [2009] andJolivet et al [2011]. The ERA-I atmospheric model provides estimates of 16 meteorological parameters including temperature, relative humidity, and geopotential at 6 h intervals from 1989 onward.…”
Section: Atmospheric Correction Of Interferogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the magnitude of the atmospheric signals we should expect to see in interferograms produced from our data set (Table 1), we estimated phase delay maps using the ERA-Interim global atmospheric model [Dee et al, 2011] obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). To estimate the combined delay from differences in water vapor (wet delay) and atmospheric pressure (dry delay), we first created delay maps using the method of Doin et al [2009] andJolivet et al [2011]. The ERA-Interim atmospheric model provides estimates of 16 meteorological parameters including temperature, relative humidity, and geopotential, at 6 h intervals from 1989 onward.…”
Section: Construction Of Interferograms and Atmospheric Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Tropospheric pressure differences also make a significant contribution to SAR phase delay [Elliott et al, 2008;Doin et al, 2009]. The absolute delay from this hydrostatic or "dry" part of the atmosphere is greater than the "wet" delay for any single acquisition date, but the wet delay is more variable between dates and so has a greater contribution to radar phase delay in interferograms [Zebker et al 1997].…”
Section: The Meris Atmospheric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%