2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00463-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance‑Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…83,84 However, reviews of applied studies using expert elicitation have found heterogeneity in the methodology used and a lack of consideration for any existing guidance on the topic. 74,76,[85][86][87] There are several methods for eliciting expert opinion. [88][89][90][91] Whilst these are generic methods for elicitation, rather than being specific for eliciting information to be used in the extrapolation of survival analyses, they may, nonetheless, prove useful when trying to improve the accuracy of extrapolations and can be included with varying degrees of formality.…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83,84 However, reviews of applied studies using expert elicitation have found heterogeneity in the methodology used and a lack of consideration for any existing guidance on the topic. 74,76,[85][86][87] There are several methods for eliciting expert opinion. [88][89][90][91] Whilst these are generic methods for elicitation, rather than being specific for eliciting information to be used in the extrapolation of survival analyses, they may, nonetheless, prove useful when trying to improve the accuracy of extrapolations and can be included with varying degrees of formality.…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%