2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to ‘The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
210
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
210
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EMT score in this study was calculated according to our previous study [25]. Protein-protein interaction analysis was performed with STRING [26,27].…”
Section: In-silico Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EMT score in this study was calculated according to our previous study [25]. Protein-protein interaction analysis was performed with STRING [26,27].…”
Section: In-silico Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An enriched module is based on the PPI network with a cutoff criterion of MCODE score > 4. A connected node indicates that the two proteins that jointly contribute to a specific cellular process are considered functionally associated [42]. The results showed that all the biomarker candidates are organically related.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Topology analysis of networks was carried out according to the values of degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality. The protein-protein interaction data set comes from the stringdb database ( https://cn.string-db.org/ ) (Department of Molecular Life Sciences and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich) ( 20 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%