2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01153-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Tension-only ideal dissipative bracing for the seismic retrofit of precast industrial buildings

Abstract: This erratum is published as figure 3 was published with incorrect orientation.Original article has been updated.Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Martinelli and Mulas, 2010 [3], Santagati et al, 2012 [4], Pollini et al, 2013 [5], Belleri et al, 2017 [6], Magliulo et al, 2017 [7], Hu et al, 2020 [8], Belleri and Labò, 2021 [9], Bai et al, 2022 [10], Quaglini et al, 2022 [11], Sonda and Pollini, 2023 [12]), or that make use of dissipative braces (e.g. Dal Lago et al, 2021 [13]). The goal of this paper is to provide an additional contribution to this relevant field, by testing the effectiveness of energy dissipation devices in improving the seismic response of precast industrial buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martinelli and Mulas, 2010 [3], Santagati et al, 2012 [4], Pollini et al, 2013 [5], Belleri et al, 2017 [6], Magliulo et al, 2017 [7], Hu et al, 2020 [8], Belleri and Labò, 2021 [9], Bai et al, 2022 [10], Quaglini et al, 2022 [11], Sonda and Pollini, 2023 [12]), or that make use of dissipative braces (e.g. Dal Lago et al, 2021 [13]). The goal of this paper is to provide an additional contribution to this relevant field, by testing the effectiveness of energy dissipation devices in improving the seismic response of precast industrial buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%