2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13353-019-00493-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Splicing mutations in human genetic disorders: examples, detection, and confirmation

Abstract: The original version on this paper contained an error. The first names and last names of Anna Abramowicz and Monika Gos are inadvertently interchanged and are incorrectly displayed in indexing sites. The correct names are presented above. Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The report by Wehrle et al () described a different mutation (c.1228G > T), at the beginning of exon 9, that also resulted in exclusion of this exon from the mature RNA. It has been previously reported (Abramowicz & Gos, ; Wimmer et al, ) that mutations in different locations can result in exon exclusion. In the categorization of Wimmer et al (), the variant identified by us (variant in the splice donor site causing exon skipping), would be classified as Type I (also possibly as type IV, due to the activation of a cryptic splice site), while the c.1228G > T variant described by Wehrle et al would be classed as a Type V (exonic variant causing exon skipping).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The report by Wehrle et al () described a different mutation (c.1228G > T), at the beginning of exon 9, that also resulted in exclusion of this exon from the mature RNA. It has been previously reported (Abramowicz & Gos, ; Wimmer et al, ) that mutations in different locations can result in exon exclusion. In the categorization of Wimmer et al (), the variant identified by us (variant in the splice donor site causing exon skipping), would be classified as Type I (also possibly as type IV, due to the activation of a cryptic splice site), while the c.1228G > T variant described by Wehrle et al would be classed as a Type V (exonic variant causing exon skipping).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Depending on the location of the premature stop codon, this results in destruction of the mRNA by nonsense mediated mRNA decay or production of a truncated protein (Lindeboom et al, 2019). mRNA degradation, truncated protein expression, abnormal protein sequences and altered isoform ratios can all disrupt cellular functions and cause disease (Abramowicz and Gos, 2018;Scotti and Swanson, 2016;Sterne-Weiler and Sanford, 2014). Alterations in splicing contribute to diseases ranging from autoimmune diseases (Agrebi et al, 2017) to neurodevelopmental disorders (Xiong et al, 2015) and cancer (Bonnal et al, 2020;Kahles et al, 2018;Rahman et al, 2020;Rhine et al, 2018;Supek et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are diverse mechanisms by which mutation-induced defects in RNA splicing act as a primary cause of disease [32][33][34].…”
Section: Disease-causing Splicing Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, deep intronic mutations disrupt splicing regulatory elements located within introns. Deep intronic mutations can also interfere with the function of transcription regulatory motifs and noncoding RNA genes [33,42].…”
Section: Int J Mol Sci 2019 20 X For Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%