2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02890-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Response shift in patient-reported outcomes: definition, theory, and a revised model

Abstract: A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02890-6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed response shift definition by Vanier and colleagues [ 7 ] needs further revision and clarification in relation to the definitions provided by Sprangers & Schwartz [ 11 ] and Rapkin & Schwartz [ 3 , 4 ] and its implications for the interpretation of results need to be explicated.…”
Section: Implication 1: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed response shift definition by Vanier and colleagues [ 7 ] needs further revision and clarification in relation to the definitions provided by Sprangers & Schwartz [ 11 ] and Rapkin & Schwartz [ 3 , 4 ] and its implications for the interpretation of results need to be explicated.…”
Section: Implication 1: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key definitions of response shift, provided by Sprangers and Schwartz [ 11 ], Rapkin and Schwartz [ 3 , 4 ], and Vanier et al [ 7 ] based on Oort [ 12 , 13 ], are listed in Box 1 . According to these definitions, measures that are particularly susceptible to response shift pertain to one’s self-evaluation [ 11 ], evaluation-based PROs [ 3 , 4 ], and evaluation-based self-reports [ 7 ]. Hence, all definitions pertain to evaluations of oneself, of which PROs are a subset.…”
Section: Implication 1: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations