1981
DOI: 10.1029/gl008i007p00851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction [to “Quenching of 0(S) by O2(a Ag)”]

Abstract: A recent paper "Quenching of o(ls) by 02 (alA g), by T.G. Slanger and G. Black was inadvertantly omitted from the table of contents. The correct reference is Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 8, No. S, pages S5S-S58.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the omission of the atomic oxygen quenching of O(•S) is to modify the efficiency to 22-29%, still in reason-able agreement with the laboratory results of Meyer et al [1970]. There is evidence for quenching below 110 km, and this might well be O2(1Ag), as suggested by Slanger and Black [1981]. These results were subsequently reanalyzed by Zipf [1979], who found the yield to be lower (2-3%).…”
Section: Any Study Of O(•s) Depends Heavily On the Knowledge Ofsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of the omission of the atomic oxygen quenching of O(•S) is to modify the efficiency to 22-29%, still in reason-able agreement with the laboratory results of Meyer et al [1970]. There is evidence for quenching below 110 km, and this might well be O2(1Ag), as suggested by Slanger and Black [1981]. These results were subsequently reanalyzed by Zipf [1979], who found the yield to be lower (2-3%).…”
Section: Any Study Of O(•s) Depends Heavily On the Knowledge Ofsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the case of the Herzberg I emission it was assumed that the third body is N2 and that the reaction rate coefficient is 4.7 • 10-33(300/T)2 cm 6 s - Thomas [1981] results are also supported by a recent paper by Slanger and Black [1981], who now have found that their earlier laboratory studies did not consider the presence of O2(a•Ag). They report that the quencher is indeed O2(a•Ag) with a reaction rate coefficient of 1.7 x 10 -•0 cm 3 s -•.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For A tot and A 297.2 , we use the values 1.34 and 0.08 s, respectively, as recommended by Gkouvelis et al (2018). We adopt quenching coefficients 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 2 = 3.2 × 10 −11 exp(-1323/T) (cm 3 s −1 ; Gkouvelis et al, 2018), k CO = 7.4 × 10 −14 exp(-957/T) (cm 3 s −1 ; Capetanakis et al, 1993), and k O < 1.2 × 10 −14 (cm 3 s −1 ; Krauss & Neumann, 1975;Slanger & Black, 1981).…”
Section: Production and Loss Of O( 1 S) Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018). We adopt quenching coefficients kCO2 ${k}_{C{O}_{2}}$ = 3.2 × 10 −11 exp(‐1323/T) (cm 3 s −1 ; Gkouvelis et al., 2018), k CO = 7.4 × 10 −14 exp(‐957/T) (cm 3 s −1 ; Capetanakis et al., 1993), and k O < 1.2 × 10 −14 (cm 3 s −1 ; Krauss & Neumann, 1975; Slanger & Black, 1981).…”
Section: Forward Modeling Of O I 2972 Nm Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%