Correction to: Prospects of legal regulation in the field of electronic waste management in the context of a circular economy

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, the second author's name was published incorrectly. The correct name is given with this Correction. The original article has been corrected. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Environmental Legislation in European and International Contexts: Legal Practices and Social Planning toward the Circular Economy

“…The aim is to reduce their environmental impact, improve their energy efficiency, and cut greenhouse gas emissions (Beheshti 2020). (b) The issue of protecting the rights of workers in the field of waste processing, regarding the creation of unified rules and standards, and as a result, the implementation of the developed norms in national legislation (Ilyassova et al 2020).…”

“…EPR may be also a key instrument in promoting re-use, waste prevention, and eco-design as well as industrial symbiosis by ensuring the provision of high-quality secondary raw materials. Besides, EU States are encouraged via their EPR schemes to modulate fees for such schemes on the basis of durability, reparability, reusability, and the presence of hazardous substances, and a database will be created containing information on hazardous substances in products, thus significantly focusing more on qualitative prevention adopting substance restriction or bans on substances or materials that can cause negative environmental impacts when recovered, recycled, or disposed (Pouikli 2020;Ilyassova et al 2020). In this respect the adoption of the term "durable lifecycle" refers to making goods of better design to become efficient and simple, ultimately leading to the extension of product life, thus, commercial buyer engaged in such a CE business model has therefore particular interests of obtaining such "durable lifecycled" goods (Beheshti 2020).…”

“…(a) The imperative urgency of waste management law since, in the past, during these key political events, there was no reliable scientific data on the risks associated with e-waste, and the corresponding technical capacity necessary to work with data in the context of rapidly growing rates of e-waste production was not used (Ilyassova et al 2020). (b) In a buyer's decision to communicate its particular purpose of using goods compliant with CE, once the buyer's purpose of using goods in the circular business model is known to the seller, a measure of responsibility automatically shifts to the latter such that, where necessary and appropriate, it should investigate the buyer's needs.…”

“…Nowadays plentiful researches have systematically approached legislation issues regarding manufacturing and industrial conditions of production. Such issues include incidents of fatalities and injuries in the industry, equipment in the workplace, personal protection, lifting systems, pressure systems, safety signs and electricity, transportation of chemicals through supply chains, first aid, as well as health protection and prevention of occupational diseases among workers at processing and recycling waste materials (Dodd 2002;Ilyassova et al 2020).…”

Study on the Regulation of Criminal Procedure System in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

“…Problems of legal regulation in the field of e-waste are explored by Ilyassova, G et al who trace the evolution of international legal regulation in the field of e-waste management and disposal and the discovery of its dynamics employing legal and predictive instruments [10]. Sovrano, F et al measure the metrics of the interpretability of the EU bill on artificial intelligence, and the interaction between the interpretability metrics and the AI interactions were explored as a way to simplify compliance with the AI bill by measuring the bill's fulfillment criteria in the proposed way [11].…”