Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93191-3_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, we employed an iterative approach, going back and forth between empirical data and the discussed theory , combining interpretation and systematic coding, using MAXqda (Abma et al, 2019;O'Reilly, 2012). We started with a preliminary open analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our analysis, we employed an iterative approach, going back and forth between empirical data and the discussed theory , combining interpretation and systematic coding, using MAXqda (Abma et al, 2019;O'Reilly, 2012). We started with a preliminary open analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodological orientation was participatory action research (PAR), which challenges and disrupts the power relationships of more traditional research methods by blurring the boundaries between researchers and researched. 25 , 26 Arnstein’s “ladder of participation” 27 represents participation on a scale from “consultation” to “devolved power”. Staff at Praxis, the Institute for Participatory Practices, New Delhi, who led the PAR approach of this project, work at the upper end of Arnstein’s ladder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim in adapting these approaches is to ensure that engagement with NMPs and regional experts empowers their “ability to speak up, to participate, to experience oneself and be experienced as a person with the right to express yourself and to have the expression valued by others”. 19…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%