2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05142-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the quality of the evidence was too low to provide reliable results. A meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (n=982) comparing ES to sham ES or no intervention 45 also identified improvements in QOL, possibly attributed to an additional favorable outcome pertaining to urinary frequency but only short-term (<3 months) improvement in urinary leakage.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the quality of the evidence was too low to provide reliable results. A meta-analysis of 9 RCTs (n=982) comparing ES to sham ES or no intervention 45 also identified improvements in QOL, possibly attributed to an additional favorable outcome pertaining to urinary frequency but only short-term (<3 months) improvement in urinary leakage.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die neueste systematische Übersicht mit einer Metaanalyse von Han et al 6 über 9 randomisierte kontrollierte Studien mit insgesamt 982 Patienten zur Elektrostimulation (ES) bei Frauen mir SHI bestätigt die positiven Ergebnisse von Liu et al 4 differenziert. ES kann die kurz- und langfristige Lebensqualität von Frauen mit SHI verbessern; sie bewirkt kurzzeitig eine Reduktion des Urinverlusts und langfristig eine Verringerung der Häufigkeit von Inkontinenzepisoden.…”
Section: Kommentarunclassified