Correction to: Differentiating total from subtotal arterial occlusion in lower extremities by using reverse attenuation gradient sign in CT angiography

Abstract

The original version of this article, published on 23 April 2021, unfortunately contained mistakes. The following corrections have therefore been made in the original: Firstly, in the "Abstract" section, the word "exitance" in the 7th line should have read "existence", and "87.5% and 90.6%" in the 12th line should have read "87.8% and 88.0%".Secondly, in the "Results" section, subsection "Diagnostic value of using RAGS", the sentence "..., 5% and 8% higher than the corresponding 87.5% and 90.6% with conventional CTA images" in the 8th and 9th lines should have read "..., 4.0% and 9.8% higher than the corresponding 88.0% and 87.8% with conventional CTA images".Thirdly, in the "Discussion" section, the sentence "..., which was 5% and 8% higher than the corresponding 87.5% and 90.6% with standard CTA" should have read "..., which was 4.0% and 9.8% higher than the corresponding 88.0% and 87.8% with standard CTA".The original article has been corrected.Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.