Correction to: Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy: an international multicenter study

Ichkhanian, Yervant; Vosoughi, Kia; Meybodi, M. Aghaie; Jacques, J.; Sethi, Amrita; Patel, Amit A.; Aadam, A. Aziz; Triggs, Joseph; Bapaye, Amol; Dorwat, Shivangi; Benias, Petros C.; Chaves, Dalton Marques; Barret, Maximilien; Law, Ryan; Browers, N.; Pioche, Mathieu; Draganov, Peter V.; Kotzev, Andrey; Estremera, Fermín; Albéniz, Eduardo; Ujiki, Michael; Callahan, Zachary M.; Itani, Mohamad I.; Brewer, Olaya; Khashab, Mouen A.

doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07651-z

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…45,46 Common adverse events include abdominal pain, mucosotomy and pneumoperitoneum, with higher complication rates when performed by lessexperienced endoscopists. 47 Surgical pyloroplasty is a safe and effective method for mitigating symptoms and improving gastric emptying. 18,48 Studies conflict as to the relative safety and efficacy of G-POEM compared directly to surgical pyloroplasty; robotic-assisted pyloroplasty may enhance safety and outcomes over G-POEM.…”

Section: Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy and Surgical Pyloroplastymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Impact of Gastroparesis on Antireflux Surgery

Maclellan

2023

Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foregut surgeons will encounter gastroparesis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and prior gastresophageal operations. Clues in the history and diagnostic studies at first consultation will inform surgical decision making. Stepwise progression through multiple treatments may be required for patients to achieve symptom relief from post-surgical gastroparesis. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy and robotic-assisted pyloroplasty are safe, effective and definitive procedures for post-surgical gastroparesis.

show abstract

Section: Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy and Surgical Pyloroplastymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…45,46 Common adverse events include abdominal pain, mucosotomy and pneumoperitoneum, with higher complication rates when performed by less-experienced endoscopists. 47…”

Section: Treatment Of Post-surgical Gastroparesismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Gastroparesis on Antireflux Surgery

Maclellan

2023

Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…G-POEM is considered a minimally invasive procedure with an acceptable safety profile [44], which is an essential element of any therapeutic modality that is offered to a vulnerable population such as post-LTx patients. Based on the most recent meta-analysis [21] and an international prospective trial [19], the rates of AEs post-G-POEM were reported to be 6.1 % and 6.2 %, respectively.…”

Section: Original Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

Role of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in post-lung transplant patients: a multicenter experience

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and study aims Gastroparesis post-lung transplant (LTx) can lead to increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and accelerated graft dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), a promising tool in patients with refractory gastroparesis, for managing refractory gastroparesis and GER in post-LTx patients. Patents and methods This was a multicenter retrospective study on post-LTx patients who underwent G-POEM for management of gastroparesis and GER that were refractory to standard medical therapy. The primary outcome was clinical success post-G-POEM. Secondary outcomes included the rate of post-G-POEM objective esophageal pH exam normalization, rate of gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) normalization, technical success, and adverse events. Results A total of 20 patients (mean age 54.7 ± 14.1 years, Female 50 %) underwent G-POEM at a median time of 13 months (interquartile range 6.5–13.5) post-LTx. All G-POEM procedures were technically successful. Clinical success was achieved in 17 (85 %) patients during a median follow-up time of 8.9 (IQR: 3–17) months post-G-POEM. Overall GCSI and two of its subscales (bloating and postprandial fullness/early satiety) improved significantly following G-POEM. Two patients (10 %) developed post-procedural AEs (delayed bleeding 1, pyloric stenosis 1, both moderate in severity). Post-G-POEM GES improvement was achieved in 12 of 16 patients (75 %). All 20 patients were on proton pump inhibitors pre-G-POEM, as opposed to five post-G-POEM. Post-G-POEM PH study normalization was noted in nine of 10 patients (90 %) who underwent both pre- and post-G-poem pH testing. Conclusions G-POEM is a promising noninvasive therapeutic tool for management of refractory gastroparesis and GER post-LTx.

show abstract