2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-017-0363-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Classification of Normal, Ictal and Inter-ictal EEG via Direct Quadrature and Random Forest Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the comparison between DQ and other instantaneous frequency estimation approaches—including generalized zero crossing and energy separation—has been examined in literature, where the outperformance of DQ has been highlighted as a powerful technique for revealing the frequency contents and their time variability of non‐stationary signals, and thereby understanding the detailed generating mechanisms and the true physical nature reflected by signals (Feng et al, 2017). Furthermore, the authors of the present work have illustrated—in previous works—the adequacy of DQ in applications to complex EEG (Abdulhay, Alafeef, Abdelhay, & Al‐Bashir, 2020), to amplitude‐modulated EEG (Oweis & Abdulhay, 2011), and specifically to ASD EEG (Abdulhay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Then, the comparison between DQ and other instantaneous frequency estimation approaches—including generalized zero crossing and energy separation—has been examined in literature, where the outperformance of DQ has been highlighted as a powerful technique for revealing the frequency contents and their time variability of non‐stationary signals, and thereby understanding the detailed generating mechanisms and the true physical nature reflected by signals (Feng et al, 2017). Furthermore, the authors of the present work have illustrated—in previous works—the adequacy of DQ in applications to complex EEG (Abdulhay, Alafeef, Abdelhay, & Al‐Bashir, 2020), to amplitude‐modulated EEG (Oweis & Abdulhay, 2011), and specifically to ASD EEG (Abdulhay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Linear methods cannot be sufficiently adapted to the nonlinear nature of EEG (Abdulhay et al, 2017; Abdulhay, Alafeef, Alzghoul, et al, 2020; Abdulhay, Elamaran, Chandrasekar, et al, 2020); linear processing assumes the strict superposition principle that fully skips the important requirement of data driven analysis or exploration based on inherent physiological processes not on pre‐assumed models. Furthermore, although a number of approaches were directed toward nonlinearity, accuracy level was influenced by the incapability of complete dissociation between the modulations of energy—in the time and frequency domains—with the purpose of extracting spectral information without the effect of amplitude modulation (Abdulhay, Alafeef, Abdelhay, & Al‐Bashir, 2020). This limitation yields usually incorrect results about the exact pace or rhythm of EEG activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations