Correction to: Anthropogenic factors influence the occupancy of an invasive carnivore in a suburban preserve system

Abstract

On page 3 (Field Methods Section), we state that: "We used a geographic information system (GIS) to randomly distribute points at an average density of 0.5 points/ha in priority preserves and 0.2 points/ha in non-priority preserves." Instead, it should state that:"We used a geographic information system (GIS) to randomly distribute points at a density of 1 point/40.5 ha (100 acres) in priority preserves and 1 point/81 ha (200 acres) in nonpriority preserves." This does not change the results or implications of the study, as anyone trying to replicate our results would immediately realize we could not have set that many camera traps across 55 preserves. In addition, Fig. 1 clearly shows the location of all points and thus the actual density. We apologise for any confusion this may have caused.