2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.83117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: The repurposing of Tebipenem pivoxil as alternative therapy for severe gastrointestinal infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Shigella spp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed a comparative analysis of the results for the Shigella intra-macrophage survival HTS and the Shigella antibacterial HTS. The antibacterial HTS had an average Z′ value of 0.75, and the inhibition cut-off was 25.5% ( 40 ). Figure 4A and B show the response distributions (i.e., the numbers of compounds within two response unit bins) for each HTS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We performed a comparative analysis of the results for the Shigella intra-macrophage survival HTS and the Shigella antibacterial HTS. The antibacterial HTS had an average Z′ value of 0.75, and the inhibition cut-off was 25.5% ( 40 ). Figure 4A and B show the response distributions (i.e., the numbers of compounds within two response unit bins) for each HTS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 3,976 hits that were advanced to dose-response testing, 98% were determined to be inactive in the Shigella antibacterial HTS project performed earlier at GSK ( 40 ), and consequently, dose-response studies were not performed for those compounds in that study. However, the thresholds for activity determination in the intra-macrophage survival (45.5%) and antibacterial assays (25.5%) were different as noted above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations