2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: The "new normal": Adapting doctoral trainee career preparation for broad career paths in science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, junior female trainees from UR groups who were not interested in PI careers showed the lowest intersectional identities across all groups. It is important to investigate the finding that there is some evidence of a multiple identity advantage, especially given that existing literature shows that individuals from underrepresented groups tend to report lower CSE than well-represented individuals [ 86 ]. In another study, postdoctoral trainees from underrepresented groups versus postdoctoral trainees from well-represented groups showed no significant differences in outcome expectations related to CSE but did show higher research self-efficacy [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, junior female trainees from UR groups who were not interested in PI careers showed the lowest intersectional identities across all groups. It is important to investigate the finding that there is some evidence of a multiple identity advantage, especially given that existing literature shows that individuals from underrepresented groups tend to report lower CSE than well-represented individuals [ 86 ]. In another study, postdoctoral trainees from underrepresented groups versus postdoctoral trainees from well-represented groups showed no significant differences in outcome expectations related to CSE but did show higher research self-efficacy [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lent and Brown 13 elaborated this theory to examine challenges and routine career decisions, negotiation of career transitions, integration and pursuit of personal goals within one's career, management of multiple roles, and examination of career setbacks. Researchers have applied this framework to careers in biomedical research, 14 careers in clinical research, 15 and careers in clinical education. [16][17][18] When considering the endowed chair from the perspective of SCCT, the alignment between endowed chairs that emphasizes human resources and symbolism with career interests, goals, and performance invites exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-individual resources in career transitions have been studied to a much lesser extent, although the potential of a career transition to direct individuals towards more sustainable career paths is influenced by wider organizational, institutional, societal and family factors. Past research has shown that some organizational resources (offered by the employing organization) can facilitate career transitions, including career planning, targeted career training, advice from line managers, mentoring and coaching by career specialists (e.g., Clair et al, 2017). However, our data points to new, independent career catalysts in the context of career transitions that had not been recognized before and that urge us to expand our knowledge about the facilitators of career transitions beyond the individual and organizational domains.…”
Section: Facilitators Of Career Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, highly qualified early and mid-career STEM researchers are increasingly seeking -or are forced to seek -more stable career opportunities outside of academia (Clair et al, 2017;Etmanski, 2019), redirecting their efforts to new occupational fields which are still related to science, but with better career prospects (Maher, Wofford, Roksa, & Feldon, 2017). This is in spite of the fact that doctoral researchers conventionally embark on a PhD project motivated by their love of science and with the intention to remain in academia (Curtin, Malley, & Stewart, 2016;Gibbs & Griffin, 2013; Van der Weijden et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation