2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0624-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG–AMP variant classification criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of testing services has been previously described (22,23). Variant interpretation was conducted in adherence with an expansion of the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines (24). Results were presented by the following variant classifications: pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants identified, uncertain (variants of uncertain significance -VUS-identified), and negative (no reportable variants identified).…”
Section: The Global Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of testing services has been previously described (22,23). Variant interpretation was conducted in adherence with an expansion of the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines (24). Results were presented by the following variant classifications: pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants identified, uncertain (variants of uncertain significance -VUS-identified), and negative (no reportable variants identified).…”
Section: The Global Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogenicity of candidate variants was evaluated on the base of mutated frequency, conservation of amino acid change and structural or function domain of the protein as well as inheritance pattern. The pathogenicity of identified variants was assessed in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines and Sherloc (16,17).…”
Section: Whole Exome Sequencing and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS testing was performed by Invitae as previously described [20], and variant interpretation was carried out based on an expansion of the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines [21]. Patient results were reviewed and categorized by variant classifications, i.e., negative (no reportable variants were identified), positive (pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants identified), and uncertain (variants of uncertain significance (VUS) identified).…”
Section: Description Of Testing Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%