2020
DOI: 10.1055/a-1145-8423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Reproducibility of Heart Rate Variability Indices at Post-maximal Exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absolute reliability was assessed via the coefficient of variation (CV, %). A CV of<10% was considered excellent,≥10 and<20% was considered good,≥20 and<30% was considered fair, and≥30% was considered poor 27 . The ICC and CV % were calculated using SPSS 27.0 software (IBM, Inc., United Kingdom).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Absolute reliability was assessed via the coefficient of variation (CV, %). A CV of<10% was considered excellent,≥10 and<20% was considered good,≥20 and<30% was considered fair, and≥30% was considered poor 27 . The ICC and CV % were calculated using SPSS 27.0 software (IBM, Inc., United Kingdom).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative reliability for FVC, FEV 1 , MIP and MEP values was assessed via the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Reliability was considered to be very high with an ICC≥0.90, high with an ICC between 0.70 and 0.89, and moderate with an ICC between 0.50 and 0.69 27 . Absolute reliability was assessed via the coefficient of variation (CV, %).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%