2010
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2622.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction relating to the occurrence of Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Bryocorinae: Dicyphini) in New Zealand reported in 2008

Abstract: Eyles et al. (2008) noted the first occurrence of Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur, 1839)  in New Zealand in 2007, with a site locality reported as the Auckland Botanic Gardens.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Flynn et al. ) and Malaysia (Mohd‐Rasdi et al., 2009). The trade of the species is generally banned in countries where it is not native (e.g., Gillespie et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Flynn et al. ) and Malaysia (Mohd‐Rasdi et al., 2009). The trade of the species is generally banned in countries where it is not native (e.g., Gillespie et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrolophus pygmaeus is an economically important beneficial insect released in European greenhouses since 1994 to control small arthropods pests of vegetable crops (Castañé et al 2011;van Lenteren 2003). The trade of this species has mainly occurred in the European countries (van Lenteren 2003), although the species has been occasionally used for pest control in remote countries, such as New Zealand Flynn et al 2010) and Malaysia (Mohd-Rasdi et al, 2009). The trade of the species is generally banned in countries where it is not native (e.g., Gillespie et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that we know all the locations where M. pygmaeus might have been introduced in New Zealand. Most of this knowledge is based on the sales records of the commercial biocontrol distributor, but since the organism had been illegally imported and deliberately misrepresented to authorities (Flynn et al ., 2010) we cannot be certain how accurate or complete these records are. Ultimately we cannot be certain that M. pygmaeus was not introduced at additional locations, but if the number of propagules, climate or habitat suitability (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least two small introductions were deliberately made into private gardens in South Auckland, though subsequent observations suggested these almost certainly did not establish (Thomas and Bullians, 2009). In 2009 it was revealed that M. pygmaeus had been illegally introduced to New Zealand (Flynn et al ., 2010) and searches failed to detect it at the Auckland Botanic Gardens from where it had reportedly been collected (Thomas and Bullians, 2009). The species was no longer authorized for rearing and sale and all known greenhouse and laboratory populations were destroyed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%