1999
DOI: 10.1109/36.789656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of the topographic effect in remote sensing

Abstract: We derive a formula for the dependence of vegetation-canopy reflectance on terrain slope (visible light only). Reflectance is inversely proportional to the sum of cosine of incidence angle and cosine of exitance angle. Laboratory measurements of miniature forest canopies set up on inclined slopes compare well with predicted reflectances.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implicitly assumes that canopy roughness is the same for both horizontal and inclined surfaces. Laboratory work by Dymond and Shepherd [31] suggests that this may be valid, at least for closed canopies.…”
Section: Topographic and Bi-directional Reflectance Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implicitly assumes that canopy roughness is the same for both horizontal and inclined surfaces. Laboratory work by Dymond and Shepherd [31] suggests that this may be valid, at least for closed canopies.…”
Section: Topographic and Bi-directional Reflectance Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, four types of topographic correction models are mainly used based on DEM: empirical-statistical models [7,17], normalization models [18], Lambertian reflection models [19] and non-Lambertian reflection models [11,20]. Some common Lambertian and non-Lambertian reflection models are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Topographic Correction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… To reduce the topographic effect by topographic normalization techniques [1,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21];  As an additional -channel‖ increasing forest map accuracy [9,[22][23][24][25];  Combined with expert knowledge or a decision tree enhancing classification accuracy [26][27][28];  Integrating the prior probability of the relationship between elevation and vegetation distributions improving image classification [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%