2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-1909(01)00070-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of synoptic precipitation observations due to systematic measuring errors with special regard to precipitation phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proximity of the Black Sea, with low roughness and strong winds can explain the record value registered at Sulina in August. underestimated at higher altitudes and during winter, consistent with the findings of other studies (Fuchs et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2005). The diverse topography and meteorological influences determine a considerable interannual variability of the correction in all regions.…”
Section: Results and Validationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The proximity of the Black Sea, with low roughness and strong winds can explain the record value registered at Sulina in August. underestimated at higher altitudes and during winter, consistent with the findings of other studies (Fuchs et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2005). The diverse topography and meteorological influences determine a considerable interannual variability of the correction in all regions.…”
Section: Results and Validationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Dew point temperature was derived from maximum and minimum temperature and shortwave radiation of H08 by an empirical equation. The method of Yamazaki (2001) using TW is potentially better for estimating snowfall than the method which uses surface temperature only, since snowfall is observed at temperatures above 0°C especially under dry conditions (Fuchs et al, 2001). Snow depth and temperature in eastern Siberia that were estimated by a one-dimensional land surface model using this method showed good correlation with observations (Yamazaki, 2001), even though Equation (1) was derived from observations at 30 stations in Japan.…”
Section: Methods To Distinguish Rainfall and Snowfallmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The global 0.5°cor-rection coefficients of Ad03 were obtained by interpolating monthly correction values that were estimated for approximately 8000 daily meteorological station data from 1994 to 1998; the correction incorporated wetting losses and wind-induced precipitation undercatch based on the gauge type provided by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO; Goodison et al, 1998). The data also included an adjustment for orographic effects, as described in Adam et al (2006).…”
Section: Correction Factors For Gauge Undercatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations