V elopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a problem in 15% to 25% of children with previously repaired cleft palates (CPs) (1,2). Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical solution. The pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty and palatal lengthening procedures, including double-opposing Z-plasty, have all been used successfully in isolation and in combination. Although several studies have begun to correlate preoperative patient characteristics with surgical outcome, the choice of procedure is often based on surgeon preference, with some consideration given to the function and anatomy of the palate. Currently, adequate evidence-based criteria do not exist to delineate the most beneficial procedure for the individual patient.The current literature regarding appropriate anatomical parameters varies greatly. Previous studies have reported that pharyngeal anterior-toposterior (AP) distance or 'gap size' serves as the best determinant for procedure choice, while others argue that the velar closing ratio (VCR) is more important because it emphasizes the dynamics of the palate. Chen et al (3) examined both forms of measurement in a study involving 18 patients with postpalatoplasty VPI and found that double-opposing Z-plasty had the most success in alleviating VPI in patients with a 'gap size' <5 mm, and hypothesized that the maximum gap size appropriate for double-opposing Z-plasty is between 5 mm and 10 mm. In terms of velar displacement, Chen et al (3) reported their best results in alleviating VPI in patients with VCR >75%. Perkins et al (4) also extensively studied gap size as an indicator of surgical success. They had a large sample size (n=154) that consisted of both submucous and repaired CPs, and evaluated VCRs. While all of the patients within the study had preoperative sagittally oriented levator veli palatini muscles, they found that patients with VCR >80% had better results after double-opposing Z-plasty than patients with adynamic gaps (<50% closure). Perkins et al (4) also found that there was no significant difference in speech outcomes in overt versus submucous CPs when controlling for confounding factors.Others correlate lateral wall movement (LWM) with surgical success. Chen et al (3) found that preoperative LWM >0.375 mm was an independent indicator of surgical success; however, they did not correlate this with resting port width nor investigate VCR. Gossain et al (5) stated that gap size and LWM should be considered concurrently to determine the appropriate procedure. Their study included 13 patients: 11 were postpalatoplasty and two were submucous CPs. Their findings suggest that gap sizes >7 mm with coexisting poor LWM (defined as <3 on a 1 to 5 scale) require both double-opposing Z-plasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty for surgical success. However, the authors agree with Chen et al (3) that larger gaps with good LWM may be adequately treated with double-opposing Z-plasty alone (5).While many studies have reported that poor LWM is associated with poor surgical outcomes with double-opp...