2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of reaction models using collision limit violation analyses: Application to a silane reaction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to [19,20], the performance of the models were determined by analyzing the mean errors of the models in different datasets. In this study, we employed the error factor calculation, as employed in [21]. For each experimental condition 𝑗, the error factor of the cell size 𝑛 (𝐸 𝐹 𝑛 ) was determined by 𝐸 𝐹 𝑛, 𝑗 = −𝜆 𝑛,exp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [19,20], the performance of the models were determined by analyzing the mean errors of the models in different datasets. In this study, we employed the error factor calculation, as employed in [21]. For each experimental condition 𝑗, the error factor of the cell size 𝑛 (𝐸 𝐹 𝑛 ) was determined by 𝐸 𝐹 𝑛, 𝑗 = −𝜆 𝑛,exp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before modeling, we first verified the compliance of the UT2017 model in terms of collision limit by CLC_script 24 because some errors in thermodynamic data and reaction rates are sometimes historically present in some reaction models, 24,25 which occurs collision limit violations. It was found in UT2017 that three forward reactions and four reverse reactions exceeded the collision limit; therefore, these were modified.…”
Section: Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further examine these trends, Figs. 4 and [24,42] and was found more suitable than the relative error to analyze highly underestimated parameters. Table 2 summarizes the results of the relative error and error factor analyses for both CV and CP reactors.…”
Section: Effect On the Characteristic Length Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%