1993
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of intensity nonuniformity in MR images of any orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible to perform a bias field correction as a postprocessing step, but again this is based on a number of assumptions about the nature of the field and its stability. 8,9 The algorithm described in the current work circumvents these issues by correcting the bias field in subtraction images rather than in the source images themselves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to perform a bias field correction as a postprocessing step, but again this is based on a number of assumptions about the nature of the field and its stability. 8,9 The algorithm described in the current work circumvents these issues by correcting the bias field in subtraction images rather than in the source images themselves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several phantom based approaches have been proposed and investigated in the past years (Condon, Patterson, Wyper, Jenkins, & Hadley, 1987;Tofts et al, 1994;Davenel et al, 1999;Moyher, Vigneron, & Nelson, 1995;Tincher, Meyer, Gupta, & Williams, 1993), but none of them have been widely used in practice because of the frequent and time-consuming acquisitions of the phantom images. To deal with that problem, the author in (Wicks, Barker, & Tofts, 1993) proposed a correction matrix to transform the estimated phantom from just one or two orientations to images of any orientation, and therefore the number of phantom acquisitions can be reduced. Besides, there also exist many studies aim at mathematically modeling the bias field (Tincher et al, 1993;Condon et al, 1987), and then fit the model to the phantom image.…”
Section: Prospective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, bias correction methods are classified into two classes: prospective methods [4], [5] and retrospective methods [6], [7]. The former avoid intra-scan intensity inhomogeneity due to special hardware and have been employed in correcting intensity inhomogeneity caused by MR's canner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%