2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Doppler Gradients for Pressure Recovery Improves Agreement with Subsequent Catheterization Gradients in Congenital Aortic Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Beekman et al devised a model accounting for pulse pressure ( normalPnormalPnormalSnormalG = 6.02 + 1.49 |normalmnormalenormalanormaln normalInormalPnormalG0.44 |normalpnormalunormallnormalsnormale normalpnormalrnormalenormalsnormalsnormalunormalrnormale, r 2 = 0.97) to correlate these gradients which was verified by the Toronto group . More recent studies have demonstrated lesser correlations between these measured gradients in congenital aortic stenosis with slopes deviating from unity . Discrepancies between Doppler measurements of aortic valve gradients and catheterization measured PPSG have been attributed to four major factors: Angle and signal quality affecting the Doppler gradient measurement. The effect of pressure recovery as potential energy is converted into kinetic energy across a stenotic aortic valve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beekman et al devised a model accounting for pulse pressure ( normalPnormalPnormalSnormalG = 6.02 + 1.49 |normalmnormalenormalanormaln normalInormalPnormalG0.44 |normalpnormalunormallnormalsnormale normalpnormalrnormalenormalsnormalsnormalunormalrnormale, r 2 = 0.97) to correlate these gradients which was verified by the Toronto group . More recent studies have demonstrated lesser correlations between these measured gradients in congenital aortic stenosis with slopes deviating from unity . Discrepancies between Doppler measurements of aortic valve gradients and catheterization measured PPSG have been attributed to four major factors: Angle and signal quality affecting the Doppler gradient measurement. The effect of pressure recovery as potential energy is converted into kinetic energy across a stenotic aortic valve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These echocardiographic parameters can support a referral for cardiac catheterization, however, are not surrogates for the PPSG based on current guidelines . Several reports have demonstrated the inclusion of estimation of pressure recovery improves correlation of Doppler measured gradients to those at catheterization . Pressure recovery (PR) is calculated using the equation below ( v = velocity across the aortic valve, AVA = aortic valve area, AoA = cross sectional area of the aorta).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative assessment of the severity of pulmonary valve stenosis is mainly based on the pulmonary transvalvular pressure drop, commonly estimated by continuous‐wave Doppler and recently by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phase contrast flow measurements . The accuracy of noninvasive measurements of the transvalvular pressure drop has been debated . Several studies have investigated the correlation between MRI measurements and echocardiography with catheterization for the estimation of the pressure drop in pulmonary circulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Several studies have investigated the correlation between MRI measurements and echocardiography with catheterization for the estimation of the pressure drop in pulmonary circulation. The results have been inconsistent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%