2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Delayed Traumatic Enophthalmos Using Customized Orbital Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, PEEK PSIs have also been used in craniofacial defects reconstruction [56], in midface reconstruction as an alternative to composite free tissue transfer or maxillary obturators [57,58]. In addition, PEEK onlay implants have been utilized in zygoma contour augmentation [31,32] and mandibular angle reconstructive surgeries [59]. While the use of CAD/CAM milled PEEK orbital implants have been documented in the literature [60,61], the production of porous, mesh-like orbital implants by FFF is relatively new.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, PEEK PSIs have also been used in craniofacial defects reconstruction [56], in midface reconstruction as an alternative to composite free tissue transfer or maxillary obturators [57,58]. In addition, PEEK onlay implants have been utilized in zygoma contour augmentation [31,32] and mandibular angle reconstructive surgeries [59]. While the use of CAD/CAM milled PEEK orbital implants have been documented in the literature [60,61], the production of porous, mesh-like orbital implants by FFF is relatively new.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of PEEK for PSIs production was influenced by its favorable properties, including radiolucent characteristics with no artifact in medical imaging, stiffness, lightweight, and conventional computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) procedures, specifically milling [25,30]. Few studies have reported using custom-made, non-porous, milled PEEK implants in orbital reconstructions [19,31,32]. However, these non-porous characteristics displaying hydrophobicity and bio-inertness of PEEK can limit its bioactivity and cause clinical concern in orbital floor reconstructions [33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overview is not comprehensive, and novel design options are regularly introduced in the literature. Posterior to bulbus [49] Orbital floor elevated in sagittal relation Amount [22] Based on clinical findings, advanced diagnostics [38] Slight overcorrection [50] Design considerations can be categorized based on their intended effect: stability, positioning ease, accuracy of implant positioning or alleviation of clinical symptoms. The size and shape of the implant are dependent on the extent of the defect.…”
Section: Patient-specific Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orbital volume is corrected to alleviate globe displacement, but the volume may be overcorrected to counteract fat atrophy and the anticipated iatrogenic loss of soft tissue [57]. The amount of overcorrection might be subjectively determined during surgery, by inserting additional spacers [51], or it may be fully integrated into the design of the PSI, posterior to the equator of the bulbus [22,38,50]. On the other hand, hypoglobus is the result of caudal displacement of the infra-orbital rim.…”
Section: Patient-specific Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation