2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of cryogenic vacuum extraction biases and potential effects on soil water isotopes application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This correlation has also been found for both 2 H and 18 O (i.e. δ 18 O CVD − δ 18 O source ) in soil samples (Wen et al, 2021). However, using cellulose in wood as an example, much of the O-bound H is engaged in H bonding that links cellulose fibrils together, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This correlation has also been found for both 2 H and 18 O (i.e. δ 18 O CVD − δ 18 O source ) in soil samples (Wen et al, 2021). However, using cellulose in wood as an example, much of the O-bound H is engaged in H bonding that links cellulose fibrils together, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The samples in the sample tubes were heated in 80 • C water, and the extracted water was con-densed and trapped in the collection tubes by liquid nitrogen. The extraction was maintained for 2 h to achieve a complete extraction (West et al, 2006). After the extraction, the vacuum inside the system was released by adding dry nitrogen gas until atmospheric pressure conditions were reestablished.…”
Section: Water Extraction and Stable Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A prerequisite for this is sampling the right water. Although CVE is the most widely used method (Amin et al, 2020;de la Casa et al, 2021;Wen et al, 2021), many other methods have also been used to extract plant water, such as high-pressure squeezing, high-speed centrifugation, and direct vapor equilibration (Yang et al, 2010). Different extraction methods, as compared by Millar et al (2018), yielded considerably distinct-isotopic signatures.…”
Section: Implications Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%