2016
DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2016.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction-free remotely scanned two-photon in vivo mouse retinal imaging

Abstract: Non-invasive fluorescence retinal imaging in small animals is an important requirement for an array of translational vision applications. The in vivo two-photon imaging of the mouse retina may enable the long-term investigation of the structure and function of healthy and diseased retinal tissue. However, to date, this has only been possible using relatively complex adaptive-optics systems. Here, the optical modeling of the murine eye and of the imaging system is used to achieve correction-free two-photon micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of RPE cells affixed on a scaffold, the cells may not migrate and the entire transplant could be extracted and would be an invasive procedure, whereas locating and selecting suspended single cells from RPE replacement or any preservation therapy would be nearly impossible. In vivo imaging systems, such as two-photon imaging, are able to detect differences in retinal thickness, light stimulation, and single cells in animal models, but detecting and then extracting these cells would not be feasible in humans, and the patient would be subjected to any lingering adverse effects of the cells (Bar-Noam et al, 2016; Maeda et al, 2014; Sharma et al, 2016). …”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of RPE cells affixed on a scaffold, the cells may not migrate and the entire transplant could be extracted and would be an invasive procedure, whereas locating and selecting suspended single cells from RPE replacement or any preservation therapy would be nearly impossible. In vivo imaging systems, such as two-photon imaging, are able to detect differences in retinal thickness, light stimulation, and single cells in animal models, but detecting and then extracting these cells would not be feasible in humans, and the patient would be subjected to any lingering adverse effects of the cells (Bar-Noam et al, 2016; Maeda et al, 2014; Sharma et al, 2016). …”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several retinal imaging tools for the murine eye have been developed. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] A commercially available retinal imaging microscope was generated from a prototype system with a 4 3 48 field of view and further developed with a wider image view and better image contrast. 9 However, the ophthalmic features of rodents, including size and optical features, compared with human eyes limit the acquisition of high-quality images in these small animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Even at low-power levels, (close to the human use safety threshold), 9 individual RGCs were clearly visible. The quantity of fluorescence photons detected was too low to calculate an additional lifetime map.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporter molecules in cell bodies can be excited with IR light to allow differential activation of rod and cone photoreceptors by wavelengths in the visually sensitive range to evoke responses in the retina. [6][7][8][9] An additional advantage of TPE is reduced phototoxicity. 8 TPE fluorescence imaging enables the study of functional physiological processes, which, in combination with in vivo ophthalmoscopy, represent powerful imaging techniques that are well suited for noninvasive in vivo retinal imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation