2021
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00273-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction for Vangay et al., “Microbiome Metadata Standards: Report of the National Microbiome Data Collaborative’s Workshop and Follow-On Activities”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transparency can also be reinforced by making sure that accepted manuscripts provide accessible, high-quality, accessioned raw data and provide metadata spreadsheets compatible with microbiome data management software (e.g., for Qiita and European Bioinformatics Institute [EBI]). Funding agencies, journals, and repositories should require and provide incentives to enforce high-quality submission standards, allow data sets to be cited, and provide better tutorials and consistent submission expectations across databases to normalize open-science practices for microbiome data (61).…”
Section: Increasing Access To Microbiome Technology and Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transparency can also be reinforced by making sure that accepted manuscripts provide accessible, high-quality, accessioned raw data and provide metadata spreadsheets compatible with microbiome data management software (e.g., for Qiita and European Bioinformatics Institute [EBI]). Funding agencies, journals, and repositories should require and provide incentives to enforce high-quality submission standards, allow data sets to be cited, and provide better tutorials and consistent submission expectations across databases to normalize open-science practices for microbiome data (61).…”
Section: Increasing Access To Microbiome Technology and Publishingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Core to this mission is the implementation of standardized metadata fields linked to microbiome datasets, leveraging the minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) standards developed by the Genomic Standards Consortium 7 . During the initial stages of the NMDC programme, it was confirmed that the microbiome research community had varied knowledge, or were unaware, of the benefits of metadata standards as well as options for available metadata templates 8 . In order to address this knowledge gap, we set up the NMDC Ambassador Program as a community learning model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%