1987
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90078-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction for contaminant fluorescence in frequency-domain fluorometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scattering is manifest as a systematic deviation in the frequency dependence of the phase angle and modulation ratio from their true values. 81 Numerical simulations of anisotropy data demonstrate that the deviations so produced are in the correct direction to qualitatively reproduce the density-dependent behavior of the differential polarized phase and polarized modulation ratio. 82 Confirmation of this hypothesis awaits further frequency-domain experiments, which we hope to undertake in the near future.…”
Section: ∆Fmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Scattering is manifest as a systematic deviation in the frequency dependence of the phase angle and modulation ratio from their true values. 81 Numerical simulations of anisotropy data demonstrate that the deviations so produced are in the correct direction to qualitatively reproduce the density-dependent behavior of the differential polarized phase and polarized modulation ratio. 82 Confirmation of this hypothesis awaits further frequency-domain experiments, which we hope to undertake in the near future.…”
Section: ∆Fmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…One of the difficulties shared by the background correction methods described by Lakowicz et al [1] and Swift and Mitchell [2] is proper determination of the uncertainty associated with the phase and modulation recovered after correction. Since our procedure operates on-line by alternating between sample and blank cuvettes, and hence performs multiple determinations of the corrected signals at each frequency, the standard errors of the corrected signals are directly observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can therefore continue acquisition until the standard error of the corrected signal falls within acceptable limits (which conforms to the customary way frequency domain data are currently collected). In other words, the user does not have to enter into an a posteriori evaluation of the error as required by the method described by Lakowicz et al [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical density of the sample was maintained at Aa60=0.1. Corrections for background fluorescence and/or light scattering were made by performing the frequency-domain measurements with phospholipids without proteins as control sample and then correcting the data as in [17]. Notably, the addition of nystatin in DMSO resulted in an appearance of a much higher background signal in the control samples (liposomes without proteins PL and PE), which required the above correction.…”
Section: Dynamic Fluorescence Measurements and Data Analysis 281 Fmentioning
confidence: 99%