Correction des seins tubéreux : évaluation de la satisfaction à long terme à l’aide du BREAST-Q

Faure, A.-C.; Mosca, M.; Regas, Inès; Pluvy, I.

doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2021.08.003

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies have attempted to compare the postoperative psychosocial benefits of these procedures using the BREAST-Q augmentation and/or reduction/mastopexy modules, as no specific psychometric measure presently exists for tuberous breast deformity. 5,[9][10][11][12][13][14] Some of these adult cohort studies have found autologous correction (relative to implant-based) to be associated with greater psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and satisfaction with outcomes. 5,10 However, other evidence suggests psychosocial well-being is greater following implant-based interventions rather than autologous methods.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To date, there has been no formal analysis of the relationship between BMI and tuberous breasts in adults or adolescents, but several studies report mean BMIs that range from healthy to overweight. 5 , 9 , 10 , 38 , 39 Authors have also postulated that the anxieties induced by tuberous breast deformity make affected women less likely to engage in physical activities that involve socialization, such as sports. 40 Our results associate tuberous breast deformity with higher BMIs, as the majority of affected patients were overweight (50%) and obese (24%), while the minority of controls presented in these categories (18% and 14%, respectively).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7,8 Most studies investigating the impact of tuberous breast deformity have found that affected women are more likely to have lactation difficulties compared with unaffected women, and several studies have evaluated the postoperative satisfaction of women undergoing corrective procedures. 5,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, there are no reports on the impact of tuberous breast deformity on HRQoL, especially in a younger population. The aim of the current study was to quantify the physical and psychosocial effects of tuberous breast deformity, using a cross-sectional analysis from a prospective study inclusive of adolescent female controls.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Impact of Tuberous Breast on Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study

Donnenfield,

Nuzzi,

McNamara

et al. 2024

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Tuberous breast deformity is a nondiagnostic, descriptive term for a congenital breast difference that becomes apparent at puberty. Although the negative physical and psychosocial effects of macromastia and breast asymmetry are established, no studies to date have explored the impact of tuberous breasts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes using a robust sample size. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, HRQoL surveys were administered to adolescent women with tuberous breasts and healthy female controls, aged 12–21 years. Surveys included the Short-Form 36v2, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Eating Attitudes Test-26. Demographics were compared, and linear regressions were fit to determine the effect of tuberous breast deformity on survey scores, with body mass index (BMI) category as a covariate. Results: Thirty-four patients with tuberous breasts and 264 controls participated. Patients with tuberous breasts had higher mean BMI than controls (P < 0.05). After adjusting for differences in BMI category, patients with tuberous breasts scored lower than controls on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and in Short-Form 36v2 domains related to physical and psychological health (P < 0.05, all). Compared with controls, patients with tuberous breasts had a higher mean score on the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Tuberous breast deformity may negatively impact patients’ physical and psychosocial HRQoL and increase their risk for disordered eating and higher BMIs. It is imperative that healthcare providers and third-party payors understand tuberous breast deformity is not just a cosmetic issue and tailor care and coverage policies accordingly.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Impact of Tuberous Breast on Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study

Donnenfield,

Nuzzi,

McNamara

et al. 2024

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

La finalité thérapeutique en chirurgie plastique

Martinage,

Volpei,

Chignon-Sicard

et al. 2024

Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fat Grafting Versus Implants: Who's Happier? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Breast implants were first introduced in the 1960s and have long been used for augmentation and reconstructive breast surgery. More recently, fat grafting for breast augmentation has gained popularity due to the ‘natural’ outcome and lack of implant-related complications. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing patient-related outcome measures between fat grafting and implant-based primary augmentation using the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire. Methods: A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PubMed®, Cochrane Library®, EMBASE®, MEDLINE®, and Scopus® databases. Papers were screened by two independent blinded reviewers. Quality was assessed using MINORS criteria. Results: Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis representing a total of 81 fat grafting augmentations and 1535 implant augmentations. The average overall patient satisfaction mean post-operative scores were 13.0 points higher in the implant group based on meta-regression (95% CI: 2.4-23.5; P = .016). There was no statistical difference in reported post-operative sexual well-being, psychosocial well-being, or physical well-being BREAST-Q scores. Conclusion: Although implant-based augmentation resulted in higher post-operative overall satisfaction scores, fat grafting remains a highly desirable alternative for augmentation in the right patient. This meta-analysis strongly highlights that careful patient selection and evaluation of patient goals must be assessed when selecting an augmentation method.

show abstract

Correction des seins tubéreux : évaluation de la satisfaction à long terme à l’aide du BREAST-Q

Cited by 3 publications

References 35 publications

The Impact of Tuberous Breast on Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study

The Impact of Tuberous Breast on Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study

La finalité thérapeutique en chirurgie plastique

Fat Grafting Versus Implants: Who's Happier? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About