2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Corrigendum: Nuclear RNA-seq of single neurons reveals molecular signatures of activation

Abstract: An incorrect version of Supplementary Data 1, in which normalized counts were analysed instead of raw counts, resulting in a smaller number of differentially expressed genes, was inadvertently published with this article. This version was not used in any of the analyses presented in the paper. The HTML has now been updated to include the correct version of Supplementary Data 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that this developmental path maintained the ‘pseudotemporal’ ordering of cells within both datasets (Supplementary Figure 9) and also aligned the two together, exhibiting nearly identical expression dynamics for canonical differentiation markers (Figure 3H). Extending this analysis globally, we observed that gene expression changes across the trajectory were largely conserved between datasets, particularly for well-characterized effectors of erythropoiesis, yet we also saw technology-specific effects -- for example a strong JUN/FOS response that has previously been associated with cellular stress during scRNA-seq 40 (Figure 3H–I). Therefore, our procedure can successfully align both discrete and transitioning populations, and enable the identification of gene-expression programs that are conserved or unique to individual datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We observed that this developmental path maintained the ‘pseudotemporal’ ordering of cells within both datasets (Supplementary Figure 9) and also aligned the two together, exhibiting nearly identical expression dynamics for canonical differentiation markers (Figure 3H). Extending this analysis globally, we observed that gene expression changes across the trajectory were largely conserved between datasets, particularly for well-characterized effectors of erythropoiesis, yet we also saw technology-specific effects -- for example a strong JUN/FOS response that has previously been associated with cellular stress during scRNA-seq 40 (Figure 3H–I). Therefore, our procedure can successfully align both discrete and transitioning populations, and enable the identification of gene-expression programs that are conserved or unique to individual datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We observed that this developmental path maintained the ‘pseudotemporal’ ordering of cells within both datasets (Supplementary Figure 6), but also aligned the two together, exhibiting nearly identical expression dynamics for canonical differentiation markers (Figure 3H). Extending this analysis globally, we observed that gene expression changes across the trajectory were largely conserved between datasets, particularly for well-characterized effectors of erythropoiesis, yet we also saw technology-specific effects -- for example a strong JUN/FOS response that has previously been associated with cellular stress during scRNA-seq 36 (Figure 3H-I). Therefore, our procedure can successfully align both discrete and transitioning populations, and enable the identification of gene-expression programs that are conserved or unique to individual datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…RNA-seq with single nuclei (nucRNA-seq) is an emerging alternative to profile gene expressions of cells in tissues that cannot be readily dissociated such as the adult brain and frozen samples. The method is further capable of coupling with sorting by fluorescence activated cell sorters [4,7], Fluidigm C1 [5], and Drop-seq [8], and demonstrated feasibilities of identifying cell types and cell cycles with nucRNA-seq data [9]. Although these works hypothesise that the nucRNA expression is representative of whole cells, to date, the direct evidence of the correlation in the cytRNA and nucRNA expression at single-cell resolution has not been provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%