2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction: Analysis of facial expressions in response to basic taste stimuli using artificial intelligence to predict perceived hedonic ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Older children can also use VAS scales [ 70 ]. For younger children, it may be necessary to use trained observers or automated facial recognition methodologies to assess the child’s reaction from their facial responses and their action (e.g., whether they grimace or spit out the sample) [ 71 , 72 ]. Where the sample can actually be taken by a child, the CAST system [ 73 ], which has recently received a letter of support from the EMA for acceptability testing [ 74 ], can provide a structured, multifaceted assessment of overall sample acceptability [ 75 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Human Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older children can also use VAS scales [ 70 ]. For younger children, it may be necessary to use trained observers or automated facial recognition methodologies to assess the child’s reaction from their facial responses and their action (e.g., whether they grimace or spit out the sample) [ 71 , 72 ]. Where the sample can actually be taken by a child, the CAST system [ 73 ], which has recently received a letter of support from the EMA for acceptability testing [ 74 ], can provide a structured, multifaceted assessment of overall sample acceptability [ 75 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Human Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%