2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl092555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting Weather and Climate Models by Machine Learning Nudged Historical Simulations

Abstract: Despite steady improvements in the skill of numerical weather and climate models over the last decades, a longstanding issue is the development of biases after initialization. These biases (systematic forecast errors) cause degradation of performance for both medium range weather forecasting and subseasonal to decadal climate predictions. They arise from issues like limited resolution, inaccurate physical parameterizations, and imperfect initial conditions. Typically, postprocessing steps are developed to hand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work has shown promising results by including data‐driven machine learning methods including neural networks (LeCun et al., 2015), into the traditional NWP workflow. Well‐suited applications of neural networks range from data‐assimilation (Bocquet et al., 2020), purely data‐driven and hybrid weather prediction and climate modeling (Brenowitz & Bretherton, 2019; Rasp et al., 2018; Rasp & Thuerey, 2021; Watt‐Meyer et al., 2021; Weyn et al., 2020; Yuval & O’Gorman, 2020) to post‐processing NWP output (Grönquist et al., 2021; Rasp & Lerch, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has shown promising results by including data‐driven machine learning methods including neural networks (LeCun et al., 2015), into the traditional NWP workflow. Well‐suited applications of neural networks range from data‐assimilation (Bocquet et al., 2020), purely data‐driven and hybrid weather prediction and climate modeling (Brenowitz & Bretherton, 2019; Rasp et al., 2018; Rasp & Thuerey, 2021; Watt‐Meyer et al., 2021; Weyn et al., 2020; Yuval & O’Gorman, 2020) to post‐processing NWP output (Grönquist et al., 2021; Rasp & Lerch, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online framework as described above trains ML solvers from scratch starting from randomly initialized parameters. Recent ML work has suggested starting online training from pretrained offline ML models (Rasp, 2020; Watt‐Meyer et al., 2021) in order to have a better initialization of ML parameters. We also tried this approach and results will be presented below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online framework as described above trains ML solvers from scratch starting from randomly initialized parameters. Recent ML work has suggested starting online training from pretrained offline ML models (Rasp, 2020;Watt-Meyer et al, 2021) in order to have a better initialization of ML parameters. We also tried this approach and results will be presented below.…”
Section: Offline and Online Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%