2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting systematic errors in high-sensitivity deuteron polarization measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reactions that produce lower energy particles, usually a deuteron or a proton, are removed with an absorbing medium between the target and the detector. A similar arrangement was achieved in a previous experiment [7] using the scintillators of the EDDA detector [4,5]. Long scintillators, called ''bars,'' ran parallel to the beam and were read out with photomultiplier tubes mounted on the downstream end.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reactions that produce lower energy particles, usually a deuteron or a proton, are removed with an absorbing medium between the target and the detector. A similar arrangement was achieved in a previous experiment [7] using the scintillators of the EDDA detector [4,5]. Long scintillators, called ''bars,'' ran parallel to the beam and were read out with photomultiplier tubes mounted on the downstream end.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scattering target for the polarimeter was a carbon tube 15 mm long that surrounded the beam [7]. Slow extraction of the beam onto the target was achieved by locally steering the beam vertically upward into the top edge of the tube.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A lower limit on the spin coherence time of 75 s was demonstrated already, just one order of magnitude below the goal for the proton and deuteron EDM experiments [29]. Also at COSY a scheme to efficiently measure deuteron polarization and to correct for systematic errors was demonstrated [30]. The demonstrated sensitivity is sufficient to reach the proposed sensitivity of d d = 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%