2020
DOI: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2020.9.iqsp-242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting Misleading Image Quality Measurements

Abstract: Fast track article for IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging 2020: Image Quality and System Performance proceedings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results on sharpness are consistent with Koren who reported MTF50 and MTF50P values for images with a known edge enhancement algorithm and parameters. 18 The consistency with the results obtained with a known method and parameters for edge enhancement confirms that the presented method for unknown method and parameters works. The prerequisite for the presented method to work is that there is an option to switch the edge enhancement between different levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results on sharpness are consistent with Koren who reported MTF50 and MTF50P values for images with a known edge enhancement algorithm and parameters. 18 The consistency with the results obtained with a known method and parameters for edge enhancement confirms that the presented method for unknown method and parameters works. The prerequisite for the presented method to work is that there is an option to switch the edge enhancement between different levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…8(a) ] and is commonly used as a summary metric for the MTF performance. 18 , 19 Sometimes, other metrics are used such as MTF10. MTF10 is the frequency at which the MTF curve crosses 0.1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison purposes, spatial frequencies of MTF50P and MTF10P were selected as metrics to summarize the MTF curves. MTF50P describes a spatial frequency where the image contrast drops to 50% of its peak value and it is less sensitive to artificial image sharpening and can provide a more stable indication of the system performance than other similarly used metrics [98]. MTF10P describes a spatial frequency where the image contrast drops to 10% of its peak value and it is considered to correspond to a limiting resolution below which all information can be considered useless.…”
Section: Detail Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%