2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1148-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting for cell-type effects in DNA methylation studies: reference-based method outperforms latent variable approaches in empirical studies

Abstract: Based on an extensive simulation study, McGregor and colleagues recently recommended the use of surrogate variable analysis (SVA) to control for the confounding effects of cell-type heterogeneity in DNA methylation association studies in scenarios where no cell-type proportions are available. As their recommendation was mainly based on simulated data, we sought to replicate findings in two large-scale empirical studies. In our empirical data, SVA did not fully correct for cell-type effects, its performance was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In scenarios where cell-type composition drives most of the variation and where the underlying main cell subtypes are known, a reference-based method is, in our view, the current state-of-theart since this approach should yield fairly reliable cell-type composition estimates, as well as a reliable set of DMCs. This recommendation is further supported by a recent letter by Hattab et al [30]. We further note that a reference-based method can be easily combined with batch-correction methods such as COMBAT if evidence for batch effects is present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In scenarios where cell-type composition drives most of the variation and where the underlying main cell subtypes are known, a reference-based method is, in our view, the current state-of-theart since this approach should yield fairly reliable cell-type composition estimates, as well as a reliable set of DMCs. This recommendation is further supported by a recent letter by Hattab et al [30]. We further note that a reference-based method can be easily combined with batch-correction methods such as COMBAT if evidence for batch effects is present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Second, if no measures of cell type heterogeneity are available for the samples of interest, another option is to use epigenomic profiles from sorted cells 76 , 77 (‘reference epigenomes’) to predict the composition of mixed samples (a process known as ‘deconvolution’ 71 , 78 ). Even if obtained from different individuals or populations (and likely even if obtained from a closely related species), this approach can provide reasonable control for cell type heterogeneity 79 . Reference epigenome-based deconvolution is an active area of research, and several software packages exist to execute it 79 , 80 .…”
Section: Cell Type Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if obtained from different individuals or populations (and likely even if obtained from a closely related species), this approach can provide reasonable control for cell type heterogeneity 79 . Reference epigenome-based deconvolution is an active area of research, and several software packages exist to execute it 79 , 80 . Data from reference epigenomes can also be used to test if sites that are differentially methylated with respect to the predictor of interest are also differentially methylated by cell type, which would suggest the two are confounded 8 , 37 .…”
Section: Cell Type Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, we regressed out the demographic variables age and sex. Third, to avoid confounding due to cell-type heterogeneity, we regressed out blood cell type proportions as estimated by the methylation data 29 using MBD-Seq “reference methylomes” we generated after isolating all common cell types in blood 30 . Fourth, principle component analysis was used to capture any remaining unmeasured source of variation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%