2016
DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2016.1209221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting Finger Counting to Snellen Acuity

Abstract: In this paper, the authors describe an online tool with which to convert and thus quantify count finger measurements of visual acuity into Snellen equivalents. It is hoped that this tool allows for the re-interpretation of retrospectively collected data that provide visual acuity in terms of qualitative count finger measurements. ARTICLE HISTORY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When subjects could not read any letters on the ETDRS chart, they were asked to count the assessor's fingers or to detect hand motion. An off-chart Snellen equivalent was derived using both the distance at which the assessment was made and the size of the assessor's fingers, as described by Karanjia et al (43) The standardized automated HVF 30-2, Central Threshold, SITA-FAST procedure was performed with the HVF Analyzer II. The reliability of the HVF test results were quality controlled by the ONRC reading center and the HVF test was repeated if considered unreliable by that center (defined as fixation losses ≥ 15%, false positive errors ≥ 20%, or false negative errors ≥ 33%).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When subjects could not read any letters on the ETDRS chart, they were asked to count the assessor's fingers or to detect hand motion. An off-chart Snellen equivalent was derived using both the distance at which the assessment was made and the size of the assessor's fingers, as described by Karanjia et al (43) The standardized automated HVF 30-2, Central Threshold, SITA-FAST procedure was performed with the HVF Analyzer II. The reliability of the HVF test results were quality controlled by the ONRC reading center and the HVF test was repeated if considered unreliable by that center (defined as fixation losses ≥ 15%, false positive errors ≥ 20%, or false negative errors ≥ 33%).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When subjects could not read any letters on the ETDRS chart, they were asked to count the assessor's fingers or to detect hand motion. An off-chart Snellen equivalent was derived using both the distance at which the assessment was made and the size of the assessor's fingers, as described by Karanjia et al (43). The method was also adapted to hand motion visual acuity to provide conversion into a LogMAR value.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An off-chart Snellen equivalent was derived using both the distance at which the assessment was made and the size of the assessor's fingers. 20 The method was also adapted to hand motion visual acuity to provide conversion into a logMAR value. Light perception and no light perception visual acuities were assigned a value of 4.0 and 4.5 logMAR, respectively.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When subjects could not read any letters on the ETDRS chart, they were asked to count the assessor's fingers or to detect hand motion. An off-chart Snellen equivalent was derived using both the distance at which the assessment was made and the size of the assessor's fingers, as described by Karanjia et al ( 18 ) (this method was also adapted to hand motion visual acuity), then was converted into a LogMAR value. Light perception and no light perception visual acuities were assigned a value of 4.0 and 4.5 LogMAR, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%