2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1704.00963
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting boundary over-exploration deficiencies in Bayesian optimization with virtual derivative sign observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2-4, all of the inferred posterior predictive utility samples are unimodal. Because of this strict unimodality constraint, the EUI acquisition function governing the search for maximally preferred indoor air temperature value corrects the boundary over-exploration effect which is typically seen in conventional Bayesian global optimization problems [73]. Intuitively, once we have observed that a given occupant responds "prefers warmer" at 21…”
Section: The Framework In Actionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2-4, all of the inferred posterior predictive utility samples are unimodal. Because of this strict unimodality constraint, the EUI acquisition function governing the search for maximally preferred indoor air temperature value corrects the boundary over-exploration effect which is typically seen in conventional Bayesian global optimization problems [73]. Intuitively, once we have observed that a given occupant responds "prefers warmer" at 21…”
Section: The Framework In Actionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are limited BO studies taking the prior knowledge about the optimum location into account. Siivola et al [20] stated that the global optimum is unlikely to lie in the boundary of the search space and proposed to overcome the over-exploration on boundary by placing virtual derivative signs ('+' or '-') on the boundary. The virtual derivative signs around the boundary are a weak form of prior knowledge for the GP model so that this method does not demonstrate any advantages in experiments if the region of placing derivative signs is not large enough.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our prior knowledge is straightforwardly related with the location of the global optimum and is a strong prior. Moreover, our method can support π(x * ) at any location instead of only the non-boundary region assumption as [20,13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since we only directly model our knowledge of f (x) and not of the location of its maximum, it is not clear how to incorporate this prior within the GP framework we described. First steps at systematically addressing the edges oversampling problem were taken in [23]. Our practical solution, is to simply reject points for evaluations if they are on the edges of our parameter range.…”
Section: Boundary Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%