Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2022.103728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting a widespread error: Neuroprotectant N-acetyl-L-tryptophan does not bind to the neurokinin-1 receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding plot and the statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism [63] . The hNK1R binding data for Substance P, aprepitant, L732,138 and compound 6 were measured in our laboratory following the same protocol and were already reported in our previous papers [17,64] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding plot and the statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism [63] . The hNK1R binding data for Substance P, aprepitant, L732,138 and compound 6 were measured in our laboratory following the same protocol and were already reported in our previous papers [17,64] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that a substantial number of in vivo studies examining the role of SP and the NK1R have used N-acetyl-L-tryptophan (NAT) as an agent with assumed NK1R antagonist activity, primarily based on the reported activities of analogues of L-tryptophan [110]. Specific NK1R binding of NAT has not been characterised, and a recent publication has demonstrated a lack of NK1R binding by NAT [111]. However, an in silico screening assay for NK1R antagonist activity predicted that NAT would have favourable binding characteristics [112].…”
Section: Non-neuronal Nk1 Receptor Activity In the Cnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an in silico screening assay for NK1R antagonist activity predicted that NAT would have favourable binding characteristics [112]. In line with the concerns raised by Matalinska and Lipinski [111], it is appropriate that further studies investigating the role of NK1R in neuropathologies should utilise selective NK1R antagonists. That said, there have also been in vivo studies where positive neuroprotective outcomes assigned to the supposed NK1-mediated action of NAT have subsequently been fully replicated with highly selective NK1 antagonists [113][114][115][116][117].…”
Section: Non-neuronal Nk1 Receptor Activity In the Cnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The move away from NAT in experimental studies was useful not only to address its inability to cross the intact BBB but also because of controversies surrounding its classification as an NK1 antagonist. While some studies have definitively shown that NAT binds to and inhibits the NK1 receptor as well as presynaptic substance P release [37], others have been unable to confirm NK1 receptor binding [38]. In circumventing these issues, studies using alternative BBB permeable NK1 antagonists may better facilitate clinical translation, particularly EUC-001, which is a highly selective antagonist of the human NK1 receptor, is a water-soluble yet membrane-permeable compound, and has few potential drug-drug interactions [19].…”
Section: Moderate Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%