2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf4a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrected SFD: A More Accurate Galactic Dust Map with Minimal Extragalactic Contamination

Yi-Kuan Chiang

Abstract: The widely used Milky Way dust-reddening map, the Schlegel–Finkbeiner–Davis (SFD) map, was found to contain extragalactic large-scale structure (LSS) imprints. Such contamination is inherent in maps based on infrared emission, which pick up not only Galactic dust but also the cosmic infrared background (CIB). When SFD is used for extinction correction, overcorrection occurs in a spatially correlated and redshift-dependent manner, which could impact precision cosmology using galaxy clustering, lensing, and Type… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Lenz et al (2017) compared the Schlegel et al (1998) maps with H 1 data (HI4PI Collaboration 2016) to derive the reddening E(B − V). This technique of modeling involves uncertainties relating to two factors: i) the gas-to-dust ratio, which may exhibit variations across the sky (Shull & Panopoulou 2024;Skalidis et al 2024), and ii) the dust modeling, which results in important differences at high latitudes (Chiang & Ménard 2019;Chiang 2023). Characteristic evidence for the high uncertainties in the dust maps is revealed by the differences between maps, especially at high latitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lenz et al (2017) compared the Schlegel et al (1998) maps with H 1 data (HI4PI Collaboration 2016) to derive the reddening E(B − V). This technique of modeling involves uncertainties relating to two factors: i) the gas-to-dust ratio, which may exhibit variations across the sky (Shull & Panopoulou 2024;Skalidis et al 2024), and ii) the dust modeling, which results in important differences at high latitudes (Chiang & Ménard 2019;Chiang 2023). Characteristic evidence for the high uncertainties in the dust maps is revealed by the differences between maps, especially at high latitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematics maps (templates) we use are shown in Figure 8. We use the dust map of Chiang (2023), and convert it to a healpix map of NSIDE = 64. To do this, we evaluate the reddening E(B − V ) at the centers of pixels of a high-resolution NSIDE = 2048 healpixelization of the sphere, and apply the 0.86 correction factor proposed by Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011).…”
Section: Selection Function Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 0.86 factor is less than the conversion factor described in Section 2.2.1 ofLenz et al (2017), where 0.884 is for the Landolt V filter, and 0.865 is for the CTIO V filter Lenz et al (2017). also noted a mean ratio N H I /E(B − V ) = 8.2, using pixels in a revised reddening map(Schlafly et al 2014) based on Pan-STARRS1 optical photometry of 500 million stars.5 The map is provided on lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov byChiang (2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%