2011 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2011.5996930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrected Fresnel coefficients for lossy materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, radio devices are normally fixed in case of M2M wireless communications, and changes in synthesis of multiple polarization vectors arriving at a device are definitive. By the way, there are many studies on reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves [3][4][5][6] depending on the surface conditions of a scatterer waves are incident on, waves produced by reflection can be regular reflection waves that follow Snell's law known in optics, or irregular reflection waves that do not adhere to Snell's law. Interestingly, one regular reflection wave is always produced irrespective of the scatterer' surface shape and roughness, and its intensity surpass that of simultaneously produced irregular reflection waves.…”
Section: Polarization Discrimination Wireless Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, radio devices are normally fixed in case of M2M wireless communications, and changes in synthesis of multiple polarization vectors arriving at a device are definitive. By the way, there are many studies on reflection and transmission of electromagnetic waves [3][4][5][6] depending on the surface conditions of a scatterer waves are incident on, waves produced by reflection can be regular reflection waves that follow Snell's law known in optics, or irregular reflection waves that do not adhere to Snell's law. Interestingly, one regular reflection wave is always produced irrespective of the scatterer' surface shape and roughness, and its intensity surpass that of simultaneously produced irregular reflection waves.…”
Section: Polarization Discrimination Wireless Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach taken by Canning (), as reformulated by Besieris (), is now generalized to the case when both media are lossy, a situation that occurs in layered complex materials. Each temporally dispersive material is assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic, and locally linear, as described by the frequency domain constitutive (material) relations trueD~jfalse(boldr,ωfalse)=εjfalse(ωfalse)trueE~jfalse(boldr,ωfalse),1emtrueB~jfalse(boldr,ωfalse)=μjfalse(ωfalse)trueH~jfalse(boldr,ωfalse), and trueJ~cjfalse(boldr,ωfalse)=σjfalse(ωfalse)trueE~jfalse(boldr,ωfalse) with complex‐valued dielectric permittivity εjfalse(ωfalse)=εjfalse(ωfalse)+iεj′′false(ωfalse), magnetic permeability μjfalse(ωfalse)=μjfalse(ωfalse)+iμj′′false(ωfalse), and electric conductivity σjfalse(ωfalse)=σjfalse(ωfalse)+iσj′′false(ωfalse),1emj=1,2.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach taken by Canning (2011), as reformulated by Besieris (2011), is now generalized to the case when both media are lossy, a situation that occurs in layered complex materials. Each temporally dispersive material is assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic, and locally linear, as described by the frequency domain constitutive (material) relationsD j (r, ) = j ( )Ẽ j (r, ),B j (r, ) = j ( )H j (r, ), andJ cj (r, ) = j ( )Ẽ j (r, ) with complex-valued dielectric permittivity j ( ) = ′ j ( ) + i ′′ j ( ), magnetic permeability j ( ) = ′ j ( ) + i ′′ j ( ), and electric conductivity j ( ) = ′ j ( ) + i ′′ j ( ), j = 1, 2.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note here that the conventional Fresnel coefficients are derived for lossless medium and do not hold for lossy materials. Here we use the corrected equations derived for lossy media [36]. FWHM increases from 122nm to 164nm over a propagation distance of 200nm, but remains smaller than 127nm within the penetration depth.…”
Section: Coupling Out Of Solid Immersion Layermentioning
confidence: 99%